P. v. Bey
Christopher Bey was charged with two robberies occurring on two different occasions. Bey represented himself at trial, and the jury acquitted him of one of the robberies. Challenging his conviction for the other robbery, he contends the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion to sever the trials of the two robberies; (2) admitting suggestive identification evidence; and (3) refusing to give a special instruction to disregard his demeanor in court. As to sentencing, he argues the court abused its discretion in failing to dismiss his strike prior convictions. Court reject his contentions of error. The parties agree there is a clerical error in the abstract of judgment. Court affirm the judgment with directions to correct the abstract of judgment.
Comments on P. v. Bey