legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Curtis
A jury convicted appellant Michael Lee Curtis of carjacking (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a);[1]count 1), second degree robbery ( 211, 212.5, subd. (c); count 2) and assault with a deadly weapon ( 245, subd. (a)(1); count 3), and found true allegations that in committing the count 1 and count 2 offenses appellant personally used a deadly weapon ( 12022.3, subd. (b)). The court imposed a prison term of four years, consisting of the three-year lower term on the count 1 substantive offense and one year on the accompanying weapon-use enhancement. The court imposed concurrent two-year terms on each of counts 2 and 3, and stayed the count 2 enhancement. On appeal, appellant contends the court, in ordering appellants sentences on counts 2 and 3 to be served concurrently with the sentence imposed on count 1, violated the section 654 proscription against multiple punishment. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale