P. v. Ventura
Defendant Robert Anthony Ventura was convicted by a jury of making a criminal threat against his former girlfriend. He contends that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the trial court erred when it instructed the jury on the need for unanimity, the effect of defendants voluntary intoxication, and the definition of sustained fear required for a criminal threat conviction; (3) the court should have granted a mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct; and (4) he received ineffective assistance from his counsel. None of defendants contentions support reversal, and therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ventura