P. v. Karaitiana
Natasha Tania Karaitiana was convicted by a jury of attempted first degree burglary, a felony. On appeal, she claims prejudicial error in the trial courts failure to instruct the jury that evidence of oral out-of-court statements is to be viewed with caution. She also contends there was insufficient evidence to support the jurys verdict, and that the court improperly calculated presentence custody credits when she was sentenced. Her first two contentions are without merit, but the last is correct. Court affirm the judgment as modified to reflect the correct presentence custody credits.
Comments on P. v. Karaitiana