In re Jolie C.
James C., father of dependent minor Jolie C., appeals a juvenile court order, made at a six-month review hearing, terminating his reunification services after finding reasonable services were provided or offered to him. James challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's finding he was provided with reasonable reunification services. He further contends the court erred by terminating his reunification services because: (1) there was no evidence that he failed to contact and visit Jolie; and (2) the court did not set a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 selection and implementation hearing.
Comments on In re Jolie C.