In re A.M.
A.M. appeals from a judgment declaring him to be a ward of the court and placing him on probation following a contested jurisdiction hearing in a delinquency proceeding under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.(See 725, subd. (b), 800, subd. (a).) He argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying a Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ), the evidence was insufficient to support the order compelling an AIDS blood test, and the probation condition prohibiting certain associations is vague and overbroad.
Comments on In re A.M.