legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re E.P.
E.P. (mother) appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her 17-month-old namesake.[1] Mothers court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court that she was not filing an opening brief pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 for lack of an arguable issue to raise. In turn, this court extended time for mother to personally file a letter brief which she has since done. In her letter brief, mother asks for an opportunity to show she is in the process of changing her life. She mentions she has completed two months of a four-and-a-half month drug program. Mothers request does not amount, however, to an argument that the juvenile court committed an error affecting the outcome of this case. (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994). Consequently, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale