In re R.G.
Appellant R. G. challenges two gang-related probation conditions that were imposed after the juvenile court found true an allegation that R. had violated Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a)(1). He contends that these two conditions were vague and overbroad and unnecessarily impinged on his First Amendment rights. We conclude that one of the two conditions requires modification to closely tailor it to its purpose, while the other challenged condition is not unconstitutional. Court therefore modify and affirm the juvenile courts probation order.
Comments on In re R.G.