P. v. Castillo
Appellant Anthony Castillo appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pleaded no contest to one count of owning, receiving, purchasing or possessing a firearm by a felon (Pen Code, 12021, subd. (a)(1)), one count of altering the identification of a firearm ( 12090),[1] and a misdemeanor charge of altering the coloration or marking required for an imitation firearm ( 12553). On appeal, appellant argues that some of the probation conditions that the court imposed when he was granted probation are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Respondent concedes that some, but not all, of the conditions need to be modified. Accordingly, Court address appellant's challenge to each condition in turn.
Comments on P. v. Castillo