In re E.R.
E.R. argues the juvenile court imposed an unconstitutionally vague and overbroad condition of probation in a dispositional order which prohibits him from knowingly associating with criminal street gang or tagging crew members and from individuals using, possessing, selling or under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance. For the reasons Court discuss post, we conclude the probation condition, reasonably construed, is neither vague nor overbroad.
E.R. also contends the juvenile courts minute order must be corrected to accurately reflect the courts findings at the jurisdictional hearing; the Attorney General agrees. On remand, we direct the juvenile court to correct that minute order to reflect the courts finding E.R. did not commit the offense of resisting and obstructing an officer; the minute order currently and incorrectly states the court dismissed this allegation. The minute order shall also be corrected to delete its reference to the court finding a factual basis for plea as there was no plea in this case.
Comments on In re E.R.