legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rush
Jessie Akim Rush was convicted by a jury on multiple counts of carjacking and robbery and one count of receiving stolen property with special findings by the jury he had used a firearm during the commission of the carjackings and robberies and by the court in a bifurcated proceeding he had suffered a prior serious or violent felony conviction. On appeal Rush argues there was insufficient evidence to support two of the carjacking convictions and the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence and in denying his motion to sever the trial of several counts.Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale