Sahlolbei v. Montgomery
Steven Montgomery (Montgomery) appeals the trial courts denial of his anti-SLAPP[1]motion. (Code Civ. Proc., 425.16.)[2] Montgomery makes three contentions. First, Montgomery asserts that the trial court erred by concluding that an anti-SLAPP motion cannot be used to strike a petition to compel arbitration. Second, Montgomery contends that the trial court erred by finding that Montgomerys speech was unprotected, prior to applying the two-prong anti-SLAPP test. Third, Montgomery argues that the trial court erred by finding that Montgomery did not satisfy the requirements for an anti-SLAPP motion. Court affirm in part and reverse in part.
Comments on Sahlolbei v. Montgomery