In re F.R.
F.R. (father) appeals from an order terminating his parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 366.26 as to Fa.R. (Fa.), born in January 2009. Father contends the juvenile court erred in finding he was merely an alleged father because the overwhelming evidence showed he was the quasi-presumed father of Fa. He further contends his trial counsels failure to request presumed father status was ineffective assistance of counsel that resulted in prejudicial error. Plaintiff and respondent San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) contends: (1) father is foreclosed from attacking the juvenile courts dispositional orders and from asserting ineffective assistance of counsel; and (2) fathers contentions fail on the merits. We find no error, and Court affirm.
Comments on In re F.R.