P. v. Doucette
Defendant Jon Michael Doucette appeals from his conviction following the trial courts denial of his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to California Penal Code section 1538.5. Defendant argues that his initial detention was unlawful and therefore the subsequent search should have been suppressed by the trial court. We conclude that the evidence does not support a detention but a consensual encounter which requires no objective justification, and the subsequent search was permissible by virtue of defendants consent and his parole status. Thus, Court find no error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Doucette