P. v. Vo
After a jury convicted defendant Thai Van Vo of grand theft (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (a); all further statutory references are to this code), the trial court placed him on three years formal probation with 365 days of local custody and ordered him to pay victim restitution. He contends the court committed reversible error in giving the flight instruction, CALCRIM No. 372, because it violated his constitutional rights and there was no evidence of flight from the crime to warrant the instruction. Finding no error, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Vo