legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.R.
At a permanency planning hearing conducted pursuant to section 366.26, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of W.R. (father) and T. R. (mother) to N.R., now 10 years of age. (All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Father appeals from the judgment, arguing there was not substantial evidence supporting the juvenile courts finding that the beneficial parent‑child relationship exception to adoption ( 366.26, subd. ((c)(1)(B)(i)) did not apply. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale