In re A.T.
L.E. (mother) is the mother of A.T., a girl born in November 2003, and A.M., a boy born in January 2001 (the children). A.M., Sr. (father) is the father of A.M., and, along with mother, of the childrens deceased younger sister, E.M. Mother appeals from the juvenile court rulings: 1) denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 388[1]; and 2) terminating her parental rights to both children and selecting adoption as their permanent plan. Specifically, mother argues: 1) she established changed circumstances and that allowing reunification services or visitation would have been in the childrens best interest; and 2) the court erred in declining to apply the parental relationship benefit exception to the presumption for adoption.
Comments on In re A.T.