Stenfors v. Banning
Aside from this, the trial court made specific findings addressing and discounting the claims of appellant and his mother for any entitlement to continued use of the disputed property through an oral easement, license or equitable easement. The trial court amended its initial ruling to include, in its statement of decision, an express declaration that as owners of legal title to the disputed property, [respondents] are the owners of all beneficial title to same. By expressly finding respondents to have beneficial, as well as legal, title to the disputed property, the trial court rejected any claim by appellant and Mrs. Combs for an equitable easement or license to use such property.
Comments on Stenfors v. Banning