legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Remble
Defendant and appellant Marquis Remble was sentenced to 13 years in prison after he violated his probation that had been granted on his attempted second degree robbery plea. Appellant appeals from an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to 13 years in state prison. He contends: (1) he could not be sentenced to prison for 13 years because the grant of probation was unauthorized; and (2) the trial court erred in imposing a second restitution fine. Court hold that appellant is foreclosed from arguing that he could not be sentenced to state prison upon his violation of probation. We also hold that the trial court made a number of errors in imposing fines, which we have corrected. Court affirm the judgment as modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale