legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Sabrina H.
J. H. (Father), the father of minors Sabrina H. and J.H. III, appeals from the juvenile courts orders made pursuant to a petition filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 342,[1]declaring Sabrina H. a dependent child of the court under section 300, subdivision (d), denying Fathers continued family reunification services, and ordering that Father not have any visitation with Sabrina H. Father contends that the juvenile courts finding that Sabrina H. was sexually abused by Father was not supported by substantial evidence, and that its orders denying Father continued reunification services and visitation with Sabrina H. were an abuse of discretion. For the reasons set forth below, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale