legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Singletary
A jury found defendant Darwun Lemar Singletary guilty of petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, 666),[1]a lesser included offense of the charged offense of robbery ( 211), and of commercial burglary ( 459). Defendant admitted that he had sustained a prior strike conviction. ( 667, subds. (a)(1), (b)-(i), 1170.12, subd. (a)-(d).) The trial court later struck a prior serious felony allegation based on the verdict and sentenced defendant to a total term of four years in state prison. Defendants sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694] (Miranda). Court reject this contention and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale