legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.W.
This juvenile dependency case concerns four children of appellant, B.O. (Mother). After the trial court terminated reunification services for Mother, Mother filed a request to change court order, commonly referred to as a Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1]petition. She requested that reunification services resume or, alternatively, that the children be placed with her under family maintenance status. Although the court found that Mother had shown a sufficient change of circumstances to support the request, it denied the request because the requested changes would not be in the best interests of the children. At a subsequent hearing held pursuant to section 366.26, the court terminated Mothers parental rights to two of the children, D.W. and T.W.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale