legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Nelson
Defendant Richard G. Nelson III entered no-contest or guilty pleas to lewd act on a child under 14, oral copulation on a child under 14 more than 10 years younger, and possession of child pornography. The trial court placed defendant on probation. It later revoked probation and sentenced defendant to six years and eight months in prison upon a petition alleging that defendant had (1) violated the standard obey-all-laws condition of probation by displaying lewd material to a minor (Pen. Code, 288.2, subd. (a))[1] and indulging in lewd practices in the presence of a minor ( 273g), and (2) twice violated a no-computer-access condition of probation. On appeal, defendant contends that (1) insufficient evidence supports the findings that he violated sections 288.2 and 273g, (2) section 273g is unconstitutionally vague, and (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to challenge the no computer access condition as overbroad and unreasonable. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale