legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Leila F.
Appellant S.S. (Mother) is the mother of four girls: Tiffani M., Harmony F., Leila F. and Cherish S.[1] Appellant Albert F. is the father of Harmony and the alleged father of Leila. This is the fourth time this matter has been before us.[2] This appeal involves only the two younger girls, Leila and Cherish. Albert contends the juvenile court erred in terminating parental rights over Leila pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Mother contends the court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition seeking to modify its prior order terminating reunification services with respect to both girls. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale