F.E. v. Super. Ct.
In his petition for an extraordinary writ, F.E. (Father) challenges a September 14, 2009 order setting a permanency planning hearing for January 11, 2010, as to his daughter, Y.E. Court deny the petition because substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts findings that there was no substantial probability that Y.E. would be returned to Father in six months.
Comments on F.E. v. Super. Ct.