P. v. Lawyer
Charles E. Lawyer (appellant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of possession of cocaine, being under the influence of a controlled substance, and driving with a suspended or revoked drivers license. On appeal, he contends the trial courts refusal to grant immunity to a potential defense witness violated his rights to compulsory process and due process under both the California and federal Constitutions. Court shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Lawyer