P. v. Goodlow
A jury convicted defendant Robert Goodlow of making criminal threats and stalking. Defendant contends his convictions must be reversed because (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to represent himself after trial commenced, (2) the prosecutor denied him his right to confront the complaining witness by remaining intentionally ignorant of her allegations of past domestic abuse in order to preclude defendant from discovering them before trial, and (3) there was no substantial evidence defendant criminally threatened the complaining witness. Finding no merit in defendants arguments, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Goodlow