P. v. Lara
Hugo Lara appeals from his conviction on one count of second degree robbery, with a gun use enhancement. He claims there is insufficient evidence of identity to support the conviction. He also claims the court erred in admitting the testimony of a police detective regarding a telephone conversation she overheard in which appellant said he would surprise the prosecutor with two witnesses, and in instructing the jury that it could consider appellants late disclosure of witnesses as evidence tending to show his consciousness of guilt. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Lara