In re D.J.
Defendant A.A. is the biological father of four-year-old D.J., a dependent child of the juvenile court. Defendant contends the order terminating his parental rights is invalid because the juvenile court failed to find that he was a presumed father within the meaning of Adoption of Kelsey S. (1992) 1 Cal.4th 816 (Kelsey S.). D.J.s mother, defendant T.J., whose parental rights were also terminated, joins in Fathers argument, but raises no contentions on her own behalf. We disagree with Father because the court properly found facts sufficient to disqualify him from Kelsey S. presumed father status. Accordingly, Court affirm.
Comments on In re D.J.