legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Muhamed E.
The minor in this dependency case, Muhamed E.,[1] appeals from the juvenile courts dismissal of the dependency petition after the court found that Muhamed was not a child described under Welfare and Institutions Code[2] section 300. Muhamed contends the juvenile court erred by failing to exercise ongoing jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (the UCCJEA) because he had been abandoned by his parents and was abused by his father, who lived in Morocco. Because substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts finding, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale