In re Muhamed E.
The minor in this dependency case, Muhamed E.,[1] appeals from the juvenile courts dismissal of the dependency petition after the court found that Muhamed was not a child described under Welfare and Institutions Code[2] section 300. Muhamed contends the juvenile court erred by failing to exercise ongoing jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (the UCCJEA) because he had been abandoned by his parents and was abused by his father, who lived in Morocco. Because substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts finding, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re Muhamed E.