Krouner v. Cal. Dept. of Real Estate
Krouner contends: (1) the Department erroneously found he was in default because he did not attend the administrative hearing, and improperly denied his application without taking into account evidence of his rehabilitation; (2) the trial court erroneously excluded his extra-record evidence and declined to relieve him of default due to mistake, inadvertence and excusable neglect under Government Code section 11520; and (3) Department failed to serve its administrative decision by registered mail under Government Code section 11518. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Krouner v. Cal. Dept. of Real Estate