legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Morales
Defendant Miguel Angel Morales appeals from judgment entered following jury convictions for robbery (Pen. Code, 211; count 1)[1]and possession of a firearm by a felon ( 12021, subd. (a)(1)). The jury also found true the allegation that defendant personally used a firearm as to count 1 ( 12022.53, subd. (b), 1192.7, subd. (c)(8)). The parties stipulated that, as to count 2, defendant had previously been convicted of a felony, and the trial court found true the prior strike allegation ( 667, subds. (c) and (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1)). In a bifurcated trial, the jury also found true the gang enhancement on the robbery count ( 186.22, subd. (b)).
The trial court sentenced defendant to a prison term of 26 years. Defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for mistrial. Defendant also argues in his opening brief and in a supplemental brief that there was insufficient evidence supporting the gang enhancement. Court conclude there was no prejudicial error and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale