legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.R.
Defendants and appellants, E.C. (Mother) and I.R. (Father), the parents of D.R., a girl born in February 2007, appeal from July 20, 2009, orders terminating their parental rights to D.R. and selecting adoption as her permanent plan. Father claims insufficient evidence supports the courts determination that D.R. was adoptable. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subds. (b), (c).)[1] Mother claims insufficient evidence supports the courts determination that the parental benefit exception to the statutory preference for adoption did not apply. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) The parents join each others contentions. We affirm. For the reasons we explain, substantial evidence supports the courts determinations that D.R. was adoptable and that the parental benefit exception did not apply.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale