In re A.M.
A.M. appeals from a judgment declaring her to be a ward of the court and placing her on probation in a delinquency proceeding under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 following a contested jurisdiction hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 725, subd. (b), 800, subd. (a).) Appellant claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish a violation of Penal Code section 422.[1] She also claims that two probation conditions, a gang condition and a weapon condition, are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Court modify the probation conditions and affirm.
Comments on In re A.M.