P. v. Fierros
Defendant Conrado Fierros, Jr., appeals from a judgment imposing sentence following revocation of probation. Defendants appointed counsel on appeal reviewed the record of this case, did not identify any trial court errors, and asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine if any arguable issues exist for review on appeal. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442.) Defendant was advised that he could file a supplemental brief with this court raising any issues he wished to call to our attention, and defendant did not file a brief. Court have reviewed the record and, finding no errors or arguable issues for review, affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Fierros