P. v. Flores
Ernie Flores (defendant) argues that his conviction for robbery is based on insufficient evidence. We will affirm the robbery convictions (counts 1 & 2) and strike the petty theft with a prior petty theft conviction (count 3).
P. v. Flores
Ernie Flores (defendant) argues that his conviction for robbery is based on insufficient evidence. We will affirm the robbery convictions (counts 1 & 2) and strike the petty theft with a prior petty theft conviction (count 3).
Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Flores