C.S. v. Superior Court
This petition for writ of mandate presents the substantive question whether there is substantial evidence to sustain the juvenile courts order that, pursuant to the so-called bypass provision of Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5,[1] the reunification services of petitioner C. S. were to be ended and the matter set for a hearing under section 366.26 of that code. Substantial evidence supports the courts determination, and therefore, after considering the claim (along with a procedural claim C. S. presents) on the merits pursuant to the requirements of rule 8.452(i)(1) of the California Rules of Court, Court will deny the petition.
Comments on C.S. v. Superior Court