legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.H.
Mother M.H. appeals from the order of the juvenile court that terminated her parental rights and selected adoption as the permanent plan for minors D.H. and T.M. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, 395; undesignated section references will be to this code.) The mother argues that the referees failure sua sponte to recuse himself based on extrajudicial circumstances violated her right to due process. Alternately, she claims there is insufficient evidence of D.H.s adoptability ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)), and the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the benefit exception to termination of her parental rights ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Court affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale