P. v. Baek
A jury found Teddy Seung Baek guilty of sexually assaulting two women, Stephanie M. (counts 1-6) and Jackie P. (count 7). As to Stephanie M., the jury found Baek guilty of two counts of sexual penetration by a foreign object (Pen. Code,[1] 289, subd. (a)) (counts 1, 4), two counts of forcible oral copulation ( 288a, subd. (c)(2)) (counts 2, 3) and two counts of forcible rape ( 261, subd. (a)(2)) (counts 5, 6). As to each of these counts, the jury also found true the following One Strike law ( 667.61) special circumstances allegations: committing the offense during a burglary with the intent to commit a forcible sex crime ( 667.61, subd. (d)), committing an offense against multiple victims ( 667.61, subd. (e)), and tying or binding the victim during the commission of the offense ( 667.61, subd. (e)). As to Jackie P., thejury found Baek guilty of sexual penetration by a foreign object ( 289, subd. (a)) (count 7). With respect to count 7, the jury also found true the following One Strike law ( 667.61) special circumstances allegations: committing the offense during a burglary with the intent to commit a forcible sex crime ( 667.61, subd. (d)), committing an offense against multiple victims ( 667.61, subd. (e)), tying or binding the victim during the commission of the offense ( 667.61, subd. (e)), and personally using a dangerous or deadly weapon during the commission of the offense ( 667.61, subd. (e)).[2]
Comments on P. v. Baek