In re M.W.
A.R. (hereafter mother) appeals from the trial courts order in proceedings under both Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300 and 602[1]limiting her right to make educational decisions for her son, M.W. (hereafter M). Mother raises two claims of error in this appeal. First, she contends the trial court abused its discretion when it limited her right to make educational decisions for M. Next, mother contends that she was entitled to appointed counsel at the hearing at which the trial court limited her rights to make educational decisions, and failure to appoint counsel to represent her in that proceeding was prejudicial. Court agree with this second claim and will reverse on that basis.
Comments on In re M.W.