In re F.S.
T.S. (mother) appeals from the juvenile courts jurisdictional and dispositional orders asserting jurisdiction over F.S. and removing her from mothers custody. Mother contends: (1) she was denied due process because the court failed to give the advisement of rights required by California Rules of Court, rule 5.682(b); (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding of jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b); and (3) substantial evidence did not support the courts dispositional order removing F.S. from mothers custody. Court affirm.
Comments on In re F.S.