P. v. Mixco
Julio Mixco was convicted of attempted robbery (Pen. Code,[1] 664/211) with the personal use of a knife in the commission of the offense ( 12022, subd. (b)(1)). On appeal, Mixco claims that his conviction should be overturned because it was based on insufficient evidence and because his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. By petition for habeas corpus, Mixco reasserts his ineffectiveness claims. Court affirm the judgment and deny the petition.
Comments on P. v. Mixco