legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Thompson
Defendant Tristan Thompson appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial. The amended information charged a total of 10 counts against defendant. Before trial, the trial court dismissed one count on defendants motion and later dismissed an additional count pursuant to Penal Code[1] section 1118.1. Defendant was convicted of forcible rape ( 261, subd. (a)(2); count 1), forcible oral copulation ( 288a, subd. (c)(2); count 2), second degree robbery ( 211; counts 3, 4 and 5), and carjacking ( 215, subd. (a); count 8). The jury found true the kidnapping special circumstance ( 667.61)[2]on counts 1 and 2 and the firearm use allegation ( 12022.53, subd. (b)) on count 5. The jury found not true the firearm use allegation on count 8. In a bifurcated proceeding, defendant admitted that he had suffered a prior serious or violent felony conviction ( 667, subds. (a), (b)-(i), 1170.12) and served a prior prison term ( 667.5, subd. (b)).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale