P. v. Treglia
On March 20, 2007, defendant Daniel Michael Treglia, along with codefendants who are not parties to this appeal, was charged with possession of a weapon by a state prisoner (Pen. Code, 4502, subd. (a)),[1] and the complaint alleged he had a strike conviction and had served a prior prison term ( 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, 667.5, subd. (b), respectively). On October 9, 2007, defendant exercised his right to act as his own counsel, and because defendant remained incarcerated, the trial court signed a standardized written order outlining defendants Pro Per Privileges. Defendant made many largely unsuccessful motions alleging that his privileges were either inadequate as ordered, or that jail personnel had interfered with those privileges.
Comments on P. v. Treglia