legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Conservatorship of Charles S.
Charles S. suffers from chronic paranoid schizophrenia. He has had many psychiatric hospitalizations and was subject to six conservatorships in the 10 years preceding July 2009. In June 2009 the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, through the office of the public conservator, filed a petition to reestablish the conservatorship under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code,
5000 et seq.). A jury found Charles "presently gravely disabled due to a mental disorder." The court entered a judgment reestablishing the conservatorship. Charles appeals.
Citing People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), and Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529 (Ben C.), Charles's appointed counsel asks that we independently review the record to determine whether there are any arguable appellate issues. Pursuant to Anders, counsel lists, as possible but not arguable issues, whether substantial evidence supports the finding that Charles is gravely disabled and whether the jury instructions were improper because there was a reasonable likelihood the jury misapplied the instructions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale