legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Harris v. City of San Jose
Appellant Margaret Harris, a self-represented litigant, brought an action against her landlord, Richard Yoza,[1] as well as respondents City of San Jose (City) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), alleging many instances of wrongdoing by all defendants. The trial court sustained defendants demurrers to the original complaint, the first amended complaint, and the second amended complaint with leave to amend. The trial court sustained defendants demurrers to the third amended complaint without leave to amend, finding that Harris had failed to state a cause of action as to either defendant and that the defects in the complaint could not be cured by further amendment. Thereafter, judgments of dismissal were entered in favor of the City and Wells Fargo.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale