P. v. Herrera
The trial court reinstated appellant Gabriel Herreras probation with an extended term based upon appellants admission that he violated the terms of his probation. On appeal, he claims the trial court should have dismissed the petition alleging a probation violation for lack of jurisdiction because he constructively filed a request for speedy sentencing in absentia under Penal Code section 1203.2a after he was committed to prison in Nevada for a new offense. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Herrera