legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Percy
A jury found Rory Bernard Percy (appellant) guilty of carrying a loaded, unregistered firearm (Pen. Code, 12031, subd. (a)(1))[1] (count 1); having a concealed firearm on his person ( 12025, subd. (a)(2)) (count 2); and unlawful firearm activity ( 12021, subd. (e)) (count 3). As to all counts, the jury found that the crimes were not committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang within the meaning of section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(A). The trial court sentenced appellant to three years in prison. Appellant appeals on the grounds that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion, since his arrest and the seizure of the firearm violated the Fourth Amendment; (2) the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury and his Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection by denying his Batson-Wheeler[2] motion; (3) appellants trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to bifurcate the trial on the street gang allegations from the substantive charges; (4) the defenses of necessity and/or duress should have been litigated in light of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) U.S. [128 S.Ct. 2783] (Heller), which upheld the right to bear arms in certain circumstances; and (5) the trial court erred in imposing concurrent sentences rather than staying counts 1 and 3 pursuant to section 654.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale