P. v. Freeman
Timothy Hans Freeman appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to forcible sexual intercourse with a child who is 10 years of age or younger, (Pen. Code, 288.7, subd. (a))[1] and aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14 ( 269, subd. (a)(1)). He contends (1) the sentence imposed on one of his counts should have been stayed, (2) the court imposed an incorrect sentence on one of his counts, and (3) the court erred when it imposed a $30 fine. Court conclude appellants first two arguments are meritorious and order the appropriate modifications. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Freeman