P. v. Briggs
A jury convicted appellant Marquez B. Briggs of oral copulation by force in concert (Pen. Code, 288a, subd. (d))[1] (count 1), sodomy by force in concert ( 286, subd. (d)) (count 2), and carjacking ( 215, subd. (a)) (count 3), and found true all enhancement allegations. Briggs contends the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him by erroneously excluding impeachment evidence regarding the victim. Briggs further argues the trial court violated his right of confrontation and right to present a defense by improperly limiting cross-examination of an expert witness for the prosecution. Court reject these arguments and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Briggs